It doesn't seem to me that anyone has discovered much that's new since the Iliad or the Odyssey.
Ulysses finds himself unchanged, aside from his experience, at the end of his odyssey.
We have gotten away from this double aspect of either putting the character back into historical events or of making a historical event of his very life.
There have been only rare moments in history where individual histories were able to run their course without wars or revolutions.
Fiction has consisted either of placing imaginary characters in a true story, which is the Iliad, or of presenting the story of an individual as having a general historical value, which is the Odyssey.
Religions tend to disappear with man's good fortune.
The Iliad is the private lives of people thrown into disorder by history.
The Odyssey is the story of someone who, in the course of diverse experiences, acquires a personality or affirms and recovers his personality.
All confessions are Odysseys.
All societies are historical.
One can easily classify all works of fiction either as descendants of the Iliad or of the Odyssey.
A very great Iliad... concerns the creation of a nation.
It is the creator of fiction's point of view; it is the character who interests him. Sometimes he wants to convince the reader that the story he is telling is as interesting as universal history.
To have one's own story told by a third party who doesn't know that the character in question is himself the hero of the story being told, that's a technical refinement.
After the magical act accomplished by Joyce with Ulysses, perhaps we are getting away from it.
For un-subscribe please check the mail footer.