I don't see the risk, I enjoy performing stunts, and I don't get scared.
Simply that we are mirroring the trends in society, at any given time smuggling was an issue in the seventies, corruption is an issue today, and we faithfully reflect those issues.
To make a film and to sell it to the distributors you need a name.
I'm going to keep making films I believe in. Whether I am successful or not is besides the point.
I never talk about my personal life. After these rumours, I definitely do not want to comment on anything.
It gets tiring, doing the same thing everyday.
The difference being that in films, unlike in life, good does always win over evil in the end.
By getting into distribution and production, I am actually widening my base.
I only want to do better work. That's the focus of my life.
You get an image after you act in a film, but it is not necessary that you last long because of that image.
In the industry, you do need some ethics - if one film does well, then thousands get work and money comes back to the industry. I guess the bottomline is, if there are two versions, then the better one will click.
Today I divide my day between being actor, producer and distributor, and the monotony is broken.
There's no doubt about Prakash's abilities as a director.
Abroad, they have covered pretty much all subjects, explored every possibility, every twist. So similarities between ideas you have and those filmed abroad are quite possible.
If somebody had started on a remake of French Kiss before I announced my own film, I would have dropped my subject. If someone else starts after me, what am I to do?
For un-subscribe please check the mail footer.